
Watchful Guardian or Judicial Overreach: The Erosion of BALCO’s Firewall in EPIL v. MSA Global
Authored by Harshpreet Kaur, 5th year, Rajiv Gandhi Nationa University of Law, Punjab and Suvigya Tripathi, Graduated, Pune University.

Authored by Harshpreet Kaur, 5th year, Rajiv Gandhi Nationa University of Law, Punjab and Suvigya Tripathi, Graduated, Pune University.

Authored by Yash Pathak and Hussain Hashmi, 3rd-year students at IFIM Law School, Karnataka State Law University.
In the fifth and final part of this series, Datuk Professor Sundra Rajoo examines the circumstances in which supervising courts across India, England, Singapore, and Australia will intervene in arbitral cost awards and the exceedingly high bar they set for doing so.
In Part-4 of this series, Datuk Professor Sundra Rajoo identifies the key factors that arbitral tribunals weigh, from party conduct and settlement offers to technologyadoption and third-party funding and examines the procedural dimension of when and how cost decisions are made.
In Part-III of this series, Datuk Professor Sundra Rajoo examines how the ICC, SIAC, and LCIA have each developed distinct — yet converging — frameworks for cost allocation. He also analyses the soft-law instruments that guide tribunals beyond institutional rules, including the ICC Commission’s empirical report on 676 arbitral awards and the CIArb Costs Guidelines.
In Part-II of this series, Datuk Professor Sundra Rajoo unpacks the four universally accepted principles governing cost assessment reasonableness, and three dimensions of proportionality and then examines the philosophical fault lines that divide international arbitration practice.

In this first part of a five-part series, Datuk Professor Sundra Rajoo, Founding President of the Asian Institute of Alternate Dispute Resolution, examines what the term “costs” actually means in international arbitration law.

This article has been authored by Surya Prakash, 2ndYear B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) Student at National Law University Odisha and Prabhas Kumar, 1stYear B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) Student at Gujarat National Law University.

This article has been authored by Dhananjay Shukla, 4th year B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) student at GNLU, Gandhinagar and Priyanshu Ranjan, 4th year B.B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) student at GNLU, Gandhinagar.

This article has been authored by Jayanti Dhingra, 4th Year B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) Student at O.P. Jindal Global University.

This article has been authored by Ms Purvi, 1st Year B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) Student at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab.

This article has been authored by Vibhor Kathuria, a 5thyear B.A. LLB (Hons.) student at Dr RML National Law University, Lucknow and Navya Chadha, a 4th-year B.A. LLB (Hons.) student at Himachal Pradesh National Law University, Shimla.
The CCADR was established at Chanakya National Law University, Patna, in the year 2021, with the objective of promoting academic research on themes pertaining to the resolution of disputes.
© 2026 Chanakya Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution (CCADR). All rights reserved.
Site designed & maintained by Ayush Kumar